Differences between revisions 95 and 99 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 95 as of 2026-02-11 01:43:36
Size: 9172
Comment: Link
Revision 99 as of 2026-02-11 03:27:56
Size: 8966
Comment: Link
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 51: Line 51:
 * [[PoliticalScience/PolicyAnalysis|Policy analysis]]
Line 68: Line 69:
 * [[MarvinFrankelsMistakesAndTheNeedToRethinkFederalSentencing|Marvin Frankel's Mistakes and the Need to Rethink Federal Sentencing]], Lynn Adelman and Jon Deitrich, 2008
 * [[ImprovingTheGuidelinesThroughCriticalEvaluation|Improving the Guidelines Through Critical Evaluation: An Important New Role for District Courts]], Lynn Adelman and Jon Deitrich, 2009
Line 71: Line 70:
 * [[WhatTheSentencingCommissionOughtToBeDoing|What the Sentencing Commission Ought to Be Doing: Reducing Mass Incarceration]], Lynn Adelman, 2013
Line 74: Line 72:
 * [[DetectingGroupedLocalAverageTreatmentEffectsAndSelectingTrueInstrumentsWithAnApplicationToEstimatingTheEffectOfPrisonOnRecidivism|Detecting Grouped Local Average Treatment Effects and Selecting True Instruments With an Application to Estimating the Effect of Prison on Recidivism]]; Nicolas Apfel, Helmut Farbmacher, Rebecca Groh, Martin Huber, and Henrika Langen; 2023
Line 76: Line 73:
 * [[IncreasingIntergovernmentalCoordinationToFightCrime|Increasing intergovernmental coordination to fight crime: evidence from Mexico]], Marco Alcocer, 2024
Line 82: Line 78:
 * [[CrisisManagementFromARelationalPerspective|Crisis management from a relational perspective: an analysis of interorganizational transboundary crisis networks]], Carlos Bravo-Laguna, 2024
 * [[SharedDemographicCharacteristicsDoNotReliablyFacilitatePersuasionInInterpersonalConversations|Shared Demographic Characteristics Do Not Reliably Facilitate Persuasion in Interpersonal Conversations: Evidence from Eight Experiments]]; David E. Broockman, Joshua L. Kalla, Nicholas Ottone, Erik Santoro, and Amanda Weiss; 2024
 * [[StanceDetection|Stance detection: a practical guide to classifying political beliefs in text]], Michael Burnham, 2024
Line 88: Line 87:
 * [[CriminalFragmentationInMexico|Criminal fragmentation in Mexico]], Jane Esberg, 2026  * [[MeasuringLegislatorsIdeologicalPositionInLargeChambersUsingPairwiseComparisons|Measuring legislators’ ideological position in large chambers using pairwise-comparisons]], Christian Breunig and Benjamin Guinaudeau, 2025

Political Science

Political science is best defined in comparison to political philosophy: one attempts to understand politics from first principles, reasoned outward, in a coherent and consistent theory; the other attempts to understand politics from observations and theories of what explains the variance therein. This page addresses the latter.

Comparative Politics

Pretty much everything where states are the unit of analysis.

Political Parties and Movements

Comparative politics methods applied to non-states. There is some overlap with public choice theory (esp. institutional design).

Public Choice and Social Choice Theory

Public choice and social choice are highly interconnected. In general, public choice seeks to be strictly positive, while social choice leans into philosophy and normative study. Like, 'given a voting system, which agent has most control' vs. 'what is the most fair voting system'. But the theorists fundamentally speak the same language, and it's more coherent to group them together by field of study.

Political Economy

International Relations

Miscellany

Reading Notes

Note: reading notes for the above topics are listed on the respective pages, not here.

Data Notes


CategoryRicottone

PoliticalScience (last edited 2026-03-10 22:28:31 by DominicRicottone)