|
Size: 5386
Comment: Moving some links to regulatory economics
|
Size: 6162
Comment: Moving articles to main PS page
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 17: | Line 17: |
| * [[PoliticalScience/CriticalElectionsTheory|Critical Elections Theory]] * [[PoliticalScience/IssuesEvolutionModel|Issues Evolution Model]] * [[PoliticalScience/PartyPolarization|Party Polarization]] |
* [[PoliticalScience/CriticalElectionsTheory|Critical elections theory]] * [[PoliticalScience/IssuesEvolutionModel|Issues evolution model]] * [[PoliticalScience/PartyPolarization|Party polarization]] |
| Line 25: | Line 25: |
| * [[PoliticalScience/InstitutionalDesign|Institutional Design]] * [[PoliticalScience/MarketRegulation|Regulat]] * [[PoliticalScience/MedianVoterTheorem|Median Voter Theorem]] * [[PoliticalScience/PivotalPoliticsModel|Pivotal Politics Model]] |
* [[PoliticalScience/InstitutionalDesign|Institutional design]] * [[PoliticalScience/MedianVoterTheorem|Median voter theorem]] * [[PoliticalScience/PivotalPoliticsModel|Pivotal politics model]] |
| Line 33: | Line 32: |
| * [[PoliticalScience/CageDistanceFramework|CAGE Distance Framework]] | * [[PoliticalScience/CageDistanceFramework|CAGE distance framework]] |
| Line 35: | Line 34: |
| * [[PoliticalScience/WilsonLowiMatrix|Wilson-Lowi Matrix]] | * [[PoliticalScience/RegulatoryEconomics|Regulatory economics]] * [[PoliticalScience/WilsonLowiMatrix|Wilson-Lowi matrix]] |
| Line 39: | Line 39: |
| * [[PoliticalScience/BargainingModelOfWar|Bargaining Model of War]] | * [[PoliticalScience/BargainingModelOfWar|Bargaining model of war]] |
| Line 62: | Line 62: |
| * [[MarvinFrankelsMistakesAndTheNeedToRethinkFederalSentencing|Marvin Frankel's Mistakes and the Need to Rethink Federal Sentencing]], Lynn Adelman and Jon Deitrich, 2008 * [[ImprovingTheGuidelinesThroughCriticalEvaluation|Improving the Guidelines Through Critical Evaluation: An Important New Role for District Courts]], Lynn Adelman and Jon Deitrich, 2009 * [[WhatTheSentencingCommissionOughtToBeDoing|What the Sentencing Commission Ought to Be Doing: Reducing Mass Incarceration]], Lynn Adelman, 2013 |
|
| Line 65: | Line 68: |
| * [[IncreasingIntergovernmentalCoordinationToFightCrime|Increasing intergovernmental coordination to fight crime: evidence from Mexico]], Marco Alcocer, 2024 | |
| Line 67: | Line 71: |
| * [[CriminalFragmentationInMexico|Criminal fragmentation in Mexico]], Jane Esberg, 2026 |
Political Science
Political science is best defined in comparison to political philosophy: one attempts to understand politics from first principles, reasoned outward, in a coherent and consistent theory; the other attempts to understand politics from observations and theories of what explains the variance therein. This page addresses the latter.
Comparative Politics
Pretty much everything where states are the unit of analysis.
Political Parties and Movements
Comparative politics methods applied to non-states. There is some overlap with public choice theory (esp. institutional design).
Public Choice and Social Choice Theory
Public choice and social choice are highly interconnected. In general, public choice seeks to be strictly positive, while social choice leans into philosophy and normative study. Like, 'given a voting system, which agent has most control' vs. 'what is the most fair voting system'. But the theorists fundamentally speak the same language, and it's more coherent to group them together by field of study.
Political Economy
International Relations
Miscellany
- Some resources on this wiki:
listings of states and city-states
listings of empires (including de facto empires)
Reading Notes
Note: reading notes for the above topics are listed on the respective pages, not here.
England in the Age of the American Revolution, Lewis Namier, 1931
Hard and Soft Law in International Governance, Kenneth Abbott and Duncan Snidal, 2000
Marvin Frankel's Mistakes and the Need to Rethink Federal Sentencing, Lynn Adelman and Jon Deitrich, 2008
Improving the Guidelines Through Critical Evaluation: An Important New Role for District Courts, Lynn Adelman and Jon Deitrich, 2009
What the Sentencing Commission Ought to Be Doing: Reducing Mass Incarceration, Lynn Adelman, 2013
Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study; Richard G. Niemi, Stephen C. Craig, and Franco Mattei; 2014
Racial Conflict in Global Society, John Stone and Polly Rizova, 2014
Politicians’ Theories of Voting Behavior; Jack Lucas, Lior Sheffer, Peter John Loewen, Stefaan Walgrave, Karolin Soontjens, Eran Amsalem, Stefanie Bailer, Nathalie Brack, Christian Breunig, Pirmin Bundi, Linda Coufal, Patrick Dumont, Sarah Lachance, Miguel M. Pereira, Mikael Persson, Jean-benoit Pilet, Anne Rasmussen, Maj-britt Sterba, and Frédéric Varone; 2024
Increasing intergovernmental coordination to fight crime: evidence from Mexico, Marco Alcocer, 2024
Unconditional Loyalty: The Survival of Minority Autocracies, Salam Alsaadi, 2025
Further Back to the Future: Neo-Royalism, the Trump Administration, and the Emerging International System, Stacie E. Goddard and Abraham Newman, 2025
Criminal fragmentation in Mexico, Jane Esberg, 2026
Data Notes
- Relevant government agencies, which link to many data notes:
see UMich's ISR