Survey Weights

Survey weights account for the design of a survey sample and non-sampling error.


Description

The design weight, or base weight, reflects unequal probabilities of selection. Generally this is simply the inverse of the sampling probability: nk/N for all strata k.

Non-Response Adjustments

All real surveys feature non-sampling error, especially non-response. If non-response is uncorrelated with key metrics, it is negligible. There almost always is some observable non-response bias, i.e. an attribute that is known for the entire population and is correlated with both a key metric and responsivity. This bias can be corrected with a non-response adjustment to the survey weights.

It is also reasonable to expect that there is unobserved bias, i.e. an attribute that is not known.

A non-response adjustment factor generally moves weight from non-respondents to comparable respondents. If there are no significant attributes that can be used to establish comparability, then the adjustment is a flat multiplier: the total of cases over the count of respondents. (Non-respondents have their weight set to 0.)

If there are significant attributes, responsivity can be modeled. There are generally two approaches:

Modeling on insignificant or uncorrelated attributes does not introduce bias, but it does inflate variance.

Post-Stratification

Post-stratification is employed in survey weighting for several reasons:

There are two approaches to this post-stratification: GREG estimation and calibration estimation. Calibration is known under a variety of other names: raking, iterative proportional fitting, and RIM weighting.


CategoryRicottone

Statistics/SurveyWeights (last edited 2025-06-22 22:47:56 by DominicRicottone)