Differences between revisions 6 and 8 (spanning 2 versions)
Revision 6 as of 2025-09-10 20:56:15
Size: 1212
Comment: Specialization
Revision 8 as of 2025-09-19 14:41:55
Size: 1795
Comment: Link and rewrite
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:
If the design of study is democratic voting rules, then the [[PoliticalScience/RationalChoiceVoting|theory of rational choice voting]] is the appropriate specialization. Building from either public choice or social choice assumptions, this is the study of how actors behave within an institution (or otherwise-defined rule set).

For studies of democratic (little d, one-person-one-vote) voting rules, the [[PoliticalScience/RationalChoiceVoting|theory of rational choice voting]] is the appropriate specialization.

Legislators are generally characterized by some combination of [[CongressTheElectoralConnection|credit claiming]] and [[ThePoliticsOfBlameAvoidance|blame avoiding]].
Line 24: Line 28:
 * [[ThePoliticsOfBlameAvoidance|The Politics of Blame Avoidance]], R. Kent Weaver, 1986
Line 29: Line 34:
 * [[LegislativeReciprocity|Legislative reciprocity: Using a proposal lottery to identify causal effects]], Semra Sevi and Donald P. Green, 2025

Institutional Design

Institutional design is a field that studies the game theoretic and comparative outcomes of structures.


Description

Building from either public choice or social choice assumptions, this is the study of how actors behave within an institution (or otherwise-defined rule set).

For studies of democratic (little d, one-person-one-vote) voting rules, the theory of rational choice voting is the appropriate specialization.

Legislators are generally characterized by some combination of credit claiming and blame avoiding.


Reading Notes


CategoryRicottone

PoliticalScience/InstitutionalDesign (last edited 2026-03-09 17:57:44 by DominicRicottone)