Size: 3381
Comment: More attachments
|
Size: 3305
Comment: Finishing content... for now
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 83: | Line 83: |
This is mostly interesting in the multivariate case, where ''E['''uu'''^T^|'''X''']'' is still not practical. The assumptions made, when incorrect, lead to... | This is mostly interesting in the multivariate case, where ''E['''εε'''^T^|'''X''']'' is still not practical. The assumptions made, when incorrect, lead to... |
Line 91: | Line 91: |
\hat{Var}(\mathbf{b} | \mathbf{X}) = (\mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{X})^{-1}\mathbf{X}^T \mathbf{\Sigma} \mathbf{X}(\mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{X})^{-1} | {{attachment:robust.svg}} |
Line 94: | Line 94: |
---- CategoryRicottone |
Standard Errors
Standard errors are the standard deviations of estimated coefficients.
Description
In the classical OLS model,, estimated coefficients are:
univariate case:
multivariate case:
Standard errors are the standard deviations of these coefficients.
Classical
Univariate
In the univariate case, standard errors are classically specified as:
Supposing the population Var(ε) is known and errors are homoskedastic, i.e. they are constant across all cases, this can be simplified.
Lastly, rewrite the denominator in terms of Var(X).
Var(ε) is unknown, so this term is estimated as:
,
1 degree of freedom is lost in assuming homoskedasticity of errors, i.e. ; and k degrees of freedom are lost in assuming independence of errors and k independent variables, which is necessarily 1 in the univariate case, i.e.:
This arrives at estimation as:
Multivariate
The classical multivariate specification is expressed in terms of (b-β), as:
That term is rewritten as (XTX)-1Xε.
E[εεT|X] is not a practical matrix to work with, even if known. But if homoskedasticity and independence are assumed, i.e.: , then this simplifies to:
s2 is unknown, so this term is estimated as:
This arrives at estimation as:
Robust
In the presence of heteroskedasticity of errors, the above simplifications cannot apply. In the univariate case, use the original estimator.
This is mostly interesting in the multivariate case, where E[εεT|X] is still not practical. The assumptions made, when incorrect, lead to...
- OLS estimators are not BLUE
- they are unbiased, but no longer most efficient in terms of MSE
- nonlinear GLMs, such as logit, can be biased
- even if the model's estimates are unbiased, statistics derived from those estimates (e.g., conditioned probability distributions) can be biased
Eicker-Huber-White heterskedasticity consistent errors (HCE) assume that errors are still independent but allowed to vary, i.e. Σ = diag(ε1,...εn). Importantly, this is not a function of X, so the standard errors can be estimated as: Note however that heterskedasticity consistent errors are not always appropriate. To reiterate, for OLS, classical estimators are not biased even given heteroskedasticity; if the model changes with introduction of robust standard errors, there must be a specification error. Furthermore, heterskedasticity consistent errors are asymptotically unbiased; they can be biased for small