Differences between revisions 5 and 6
Revision 5 as of 2025-10-26 16:46:08
Size: 3362
Comment: Typo
Revision 6 as of 2025-11-03 01:42:39
Size: 3355
Comment: Links
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 21: Line 21:
Strong assumptions about the variance structure are made. Strong assumptions about the (co-)variance structure are made.
Line 24: Line 24:
   * Therefore the covariance of errors between two measurements of the same individual is:    * Therefore the [[Statistics/Covariance|covariance]] of errors between two measurements of the same individual is:
Line 29: Line 29:
   * For the same reasons, the '''variance''' of errors (i.e., the covariance between a measurement and itself) simplifies to ''σ,,α,,^2^ + σ,,u,,^2^''.    * For the same reasons, the [[Statistics/Variance|variance]] of errors simplifies to ''σ,,α,,^2^ + σ,,u,,^2^''.

Random Effects Model

A random effects model utilizes repeated observations (i.e., panel data) to decompose and correct for within-group and between-group heterogeneity.


Description

This model is used for panel analysis.

A good starting point for modeling with panel data is the pooled OLS model. This model builds upon weaknesses of that methodology.

It is helpful to establish a decomposition for the unit error term εit into time-variant and time-invariant components: uit and αi.

Also, consider N to the total number of observations. If using a balanced panel, i.e. all individuals i have T observations, this is simply nT. More generally though, the calculation is n.svg.

Strong assumptions about the (co-)variance structure are made.

  • Errors are distributed about 0, i.e. E[εit] = 0.

    • Therefore the covariance of errors between two measurements of the same individual is:

      • Cov(εit, εis) = E[(εit - 0)(εis - 0)] = E[εitεis]

      • Cov(εit, εis) = E[(uit + αi)(uis + αi)] = E[uituis + uitαi + uisαi + αi2]

  • The components of errors are independent.
    • The above simplifies to σα2.

    • For the same reasons, the variance of errors simplifies to σα2 + σu2.

  • There is zero covariance between the errors and any predictor.

The first two lead to a Ti by Ti covariance matrix for any individual i:

sigma.svg

Furthermore, the covariance matrix for all individuals and all measurements can be fully expressed in a N by N covariance matrix like:

omega.svg

Note that all off-diagonal covariances are zero unless individuals i and j are the same.

The final assumption is important because the total errors, ε composed of εit, can then be calculated using a de-meaned within estimator. The diagonal members can be summed and averaged to arrive at σε2:

within1.svg

There are a few different estimators for σα2, but the simplest intuition is summing and averaging the off-diagonal members.

Feasible GLS is used to fit the random effects model. This can be interpreted as transforming the space by weights, θ composed of θi, that mix observations with individual-level averages.

The weights are specified as:

theta.svg

And the random effects model can be formulated as:

re.svg

As θi approaches 1, this model converges to the fixed effects model. As θi approaches 0, this model converges to a pooled OLS model.

Because of this nesting and the fact that the fixed effects model is less efficient but must be consistent, a Hausman test should be performed with the null hypothesis that the random effects model is consistent. If rejected, the fixed effects model should be used instead.


CategoryRicottone

Statistics/RandomEffectsModel (last edited 2025-11-03 01:42:39 by DominicRicottone)