Differences between revisions 9 and 12 (spanning 3 versions)
Revision 9 as of 2026-02-11 02:42:36
Size: 2507
Comment: Links
Revision 12 as of 2026-04-02 17:58:36
Size: 3045
Comment: Link
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 33: Line 33:
 * [[MisperceptionOfPartyCongruenceAndSatisfactionWithDemocracy|(Mis)perception of party congruence and satisfaction with democracy]]; Royce Carroll, Yen-Chieh Liao, and Li Tang; 2024
Line 37: Line 38:
 * [[DoDonorsPunishExtremistPrimaryNominees|Do Donors Punish Extremist Primary Nominees? Evidence from Congress and American State Legislatures]], Andrew C. W. Myers, 2025
 * [[MeasuringPartyIdentificationInPublicOpinionSurveysOfAmericans|Measuring Party Identification in Public Opinion Surveys of Americans]], Joshua J. Dyck and Jack Santucci, 2026

Party Polarization

Party polarization is a general framework that formulated political polarization in terms of political parties.


Description

Party polarization is a very loose framework that simply prescribes studying political polarization in terms of political parties, as opposed to behavioral theory.

These theories generally assume that 'partisanship' or 'extremism' is defined by consistent ideological opinions. The counter-example is that a moderate's opinions are either not strongly held or ideologically-inconsistent (suggesting they are informed by something external).

There are many closely-related fields in the public choice and political philosophy spaces.

  • Choice models including:
  • Critical theories, e.g. Marxism, have a clear interpretation of both polarization (i.e., history of conflict) and lack of polarization (i.e., elites suppressing consciousness).

  • Polarization is a topic of study in the field of institutional design.


Reading Notes


CategoryRicottone

PoliticalScience/PartyPolarization (last edited 2026-04-02 17:58:36 by DominicRicottone)