Differences between revisions 28 and 29
Revision 28 as of 2026-03-09 17:57:44
Size: 3113
Comment: Links
Revision 29 as of 2026-08-12 20:19:31
Size: 3450
Comment: Links
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 41: Line 41:
 * [[HowFirmsBureaucratsAndMinistriesBenefitFromTheRevolvingDoor|How Firms, Bureaucrats, and Ministries Benefit from the Revolving Door: Evidence from Japan]], Trevor Incerti, 2026
 * [[PolicymakingActivitiesOfCaretakerGovernmentsInWesternEurope|Policymaking activities of caretaker governments in Western Europe]], Mingyi Zhang, 2026

Institutional Design

Institutional design is a field that studies the game theoretic and comparative outcomes of structures.


Description

Institutional design is the study of how actors behave within an institution (or otherwise-defined rule set) and of how to shape an institution to yield certain behavior.

It implicitly assumes instrumentalism in that the form of institutions derives from utility rather than philosophy. Beyond this, it generally builds from either public choice or social choice methods for measuring and comparing utility. Legislators are generally characterized by some combination of credit claiming and blame avoiding.

If assumptions about rationality and utility functions are not being made, the work is better classified under comparative politics.

For studies of democratic (little d, one-person-one-vote) voting rules, the theory of rational choice voting is the appropriate specialization.


Reading Notes


CategoryRicottone

PoliticalScience/InstitutionalDesign (last edited 2026-08-12 20:19:31 by DominicRicottone)