Differences between revisions 27 and 28
Revision 27 as of 2026-02-13 15:44:23
Size: 2747
Comment: Moved link
Revision 28 as of 2026-03-09 17:57:44
Size: 3113
Comment: Links
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 33: Line 33:
 * [[JudicialBehaviorUnderPoliticalConstraints|Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice]]; Clifford J. Carrubba, Matthew Gabel, and Charles Hankla; 2008
Line 34: Line 35:
 * [[DemocracyAndMultilateralism|Democracy and Multilateralism: The Case of Vote Buying in the UN General Assembly]], David B. Carter and Randall W. Stone, 2015

Institutional Design

Institutional design is a field that studies the game theoretic and comparative outcomes of structures.


Description

Institutional design is the study of how actors behave within an institution (or otherwise-defined rule set) and of how to shape an institution to yield certain behavior.

It implicitly assumes instrumentalism in that the form of institutions derives from utility rather than philosophy. Beyond this, it generally builds from either public choice or social choice methods for measuring and comparing utility. Legislators are generally characterized by some combination of credit claiming and blame avoiding.

If assumptions about rationality and utility functions are not being made, the work is better classified under comparative politics.

For studies of democratic (little d, one-person-one-vote) voting rules, the theory of rational choice voting is the appropriate specialization.


Reading Notes


CategoryRicottone

PoliticalScience/InstitutionalDesign (last edited 2026-03-09 17:57:44 by DominicRicottone)