Size: 6142
Comment: Fixed link
|
Size: 6374
Comment: Style and added links
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 3: | Line 3: |
A fundamental step to solving systems of equations with linear algebra is '''elimination'''. This is also called '''Gaussian elimination''' or '''Gauss–Jordan elimination'''. | '''Gaussian elimination''' or '''Gauss-Jordan elimination''' is a foundational process for solving systems of linear equations. Elimination can be generalized as the process of transforming an unsolvable '''''A'''x = b'' into a solvable '''''U'''x = c''. |
Line 47: | Line 49: |
This system can be expressed in the form ''Ax = b'': | This system can be expressed in the form '''''A'''x = b'': |
Line 63: | Line 65: |
The solution lies in the '''elimination''' of ''A''. | The solution lies in the '''elimination''' of '''''A'''''. |
Line 98: | Line 100: |
This process is then repeated for every row below. In this specific problem the multiple is 0 as there is already a 0 in place. | This process is then repeated for every row below. In this specific problem the multiple is zero as there is already a zero in place. |
Line 141: | Line 143: |
Another iteration of elimination yields this matrix, ''U''. | Another iteration of elimination yields this matrix, '''''U'''''. |
Line 151: | Line 153: |
''U'' is called the '''upper triangle''' matrix for square (''n'' by ''n'') matrices, but more generally and formally is called the '''row echelon form''' of ''A''. | '''''U''''' is the '''row echelon form''' of '''''A'''''. It may also be a [[LinearAlgebra/SpecialMatrices#Upper_Triangular_Matrices|upper triangular matrix]]. |
Line 191: | Line 193: |
The system has been reduced to ''Ux = c'': | The system has been reduced to '''''U'''x = c'': |
Line 215: | Line 217: |
Instead of eliminating ''A'' then re-balancing ''b'', eliminate the augmented matrix in a single step. | Instead of eliminating '''''A''''' then re-balancing ''b'', eliminate the augmented matrix in a single step. |
Line 265: | Line 267: |
A matrix can be further reduced with '''backwards elimination'''. This means to repeat elimination in the opposite direction until all numbers above ''and'' below the pivots are zero. This yields the '''reduced row echelon form''' of ''A'', notated as ''R''. | '''''U''''' can be further reduced with '''backwards elimination'''. Repeat the process in the opposite direction until all numbers above ''and'' below the pivots are zero, yielding the matrix '''''R'''''. '''''R''''' is the '''reduced row echelon form''' of '''''A'''''. It may also be a [[LinearAlgebra/SpecialMatrices#Lower_Triangular_Matrices|lower triangular matrix]]. |
Line 273: | Line 277: |
Elimination is the process to transform ''A'' -> ''U'', where ''U'' must have ''n'' non-zero pivots for ''n'' unknowns. If the equations align such that a pivot would be 0, you have '''temporary failure'''. Re-align the equations and re-eliminate. If the equations cannot be re-aligned to solve, you have '''permanent failure''' |
'''''U''''' must have ''n'' non-zero pivots for ''n'' unknowns. As noted above, if a pivot is zero, rows should be swapped using [[LinearAlgebra/SpecialMatrices#Permutation_Matrices|permutation matrices]]. This is a '''temporary failure'''. If rows cannot be swapped to complete elimination, the system has '''permanent failure''' |
Elimination
Gaussian elimination or Gauss-Jordan elimination is a foundational process for solving systems of linear equations.
Elimination can be generalized as the process of transforming an unsolvable Ax = b into a solvable Ux = c.
Contents
Introduction
Consider the below system of equations.
x + 2y + z = 2 3x + 8y + z = 12 4y + z = 2
The first step to solving this system with traditional algebra is eliminating x.
Trivially rewrite the first equation:
x + 2y + z = 2 x = 2 - 2y - z
Substitute this into the second equation:
3x + 8y + z = 12 3(2 - 2y - z) + 8y + z = 12 6 - 6y - 3z + 8y + z = 12 2y - 2z = 6
Now x has been eliminated. But can either y or z be eliminated the same way?
Linear Algebra
This system can be expressed in the form Ax = b:
A x = b ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ │ 1 2 1│ │ x│ │ 2│ │ 3 8 1│ │ y│ = │12│ │ 0 4 1│ │ z│ │ 2│ └ ┘ └ ┘ └ ┘
Eliminating A
The solution lies in the elimination of A.
The first step is identifying pivots. By reducing the entire column to zeros and the pivot, it is eliminated into a pivot column.
Pivots are noted with boxes or circles in the matrix, as in:
┌ ┐ │ [1] 2 1│ │ 3 8 1│ │ 0 4 1│ └ ┘
Algebraically, a value is being zeroed out by expressing that variable in terms of the other equations.
Literally, we are subtracting a multiple of the pivot row from the targeted row to create a zero below the pivot. That multiple is discovered by solving part of the equation.
┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ │ 3│ │ 1│ │ 0│ │ 8│ - m│ 2│ = │ ?│ │ 1│ │ 1│ │ ?│ └ ┘ └ ┘ └ ┘ 3 - 1m = 0 m = 3 ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ │ 3│ │ 1│ │ 0│ │ 8│ - 3│ 2│ = │ 2│ │ 1│ │ 1│ │ -2│ └ ┘ └ ┘ └ ┘
This process is then repeated for every row below. In this specific problem the multiple is zero as there is already a zero in place.
┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ │ 0│ │ 1│ │ 0│ │ 4│ - m│ 2│ = │ ?│ │ 1│ │ 1│ │ ?│ └ ┘ └ ┘ └ ┘ 0 - 1m = 0 m = 0 ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ │ 0│ │ 1│ │ 0│ │ 4│ - 0│ 2│ = │ 4│ │ 1│ │ 1│ │ 1│ └ ┘ └ ┘ └ ┘
The matrix is reconstructed:
┌ ┐ │ [1] 2 1│ │ 0 2 -2│ │ 0 4 1│ └ ┘
The process is then repeated with a new pivot.
If a pivot is zero, rows should be swapped using permutation matrices. If all rows are zero, then this is a free column (as opposed to a pivot column) and should be skipped.
In this specific problem we do have another pivot.
┌ ┐ │ [1] 2 1│ │ 0 [2] -2│ │ 0 4 1│ └ ┘
Another iteration of elimination yields this matrix, U.
┌ ┐ │[1] 2 1 │ │ 0 [2] -2 │ │ 0 0 [5]│ └ ┘
U is the row echelon form of A. It may also be a upper triangular matrix.
Balancing the Right Hand Side
To re-balance the original equation, replicate the subtractions on b. Recall that the (non-zero) multipliers were 3 and 2:
┌ ┐ │ 2│ │12│ │ 2│ └ ┘ 12 - 2m 12 - 2(3) 6 ┌ ┐ │ 2│ │ 6│ │ 2│ └ ┘ 2 - 6m 2 - 6(2) -10 ┌ ┐ │ 2│ │ 6│ │-10│ └ ┘
Result of Elimination
The system has been reduced to Ux = c:
┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ │[1] 2 1 │ │ x│ │ 2│ │ 0 [2] -2 │ │ y│ = │ 6│ │ 0 0 [5]│ │ z│ │-10│ └ ┘ └ ┘ └ ┘
x + 2y + z = 2 2y + 2z = 6 5x = -10
Algebraic substitution can now be used to solve; x=2, y=1, z=-2.
Simplification with Augmented Matrices
Instead of eliminating A then re-balancing b, eliminate the augmented matrix in a single step.
Augmented matrix = [ A b] ┌ ┐ │ 1 2 1 2│ Augmented matrix = │ 3 8 1 12│ │ 0 4 1 2│ └ ┘
Elimination proceeds the exact same way.
┌ ┐ │[1] 2 1 2│ │ 3 8 1 12│ │ 0 4 1 2│ └ ┘ ┌ ┐ │[1] 2 1 2│ │ 0 [2] -2 6│ │ 0 4 1 2│ └ ┘ ┌ ┐ │[1] 2 1 2│ │ 0 [2] -2 6│ │ 0 0 [5] -10│ └ ┘
Which can be re-expressed as:
┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ ┌ ┐ │[1] 2 1 │ │ x│ │ 2│ │ 0 [2] -2 │ │ y│ = │ 6│ │ 0 0 [5]│ │ z│ │-10│ └ ┘ └ ┘ └ ┘
Note that this matches the reduced system that was achieved above.
Reduced Row Echelon Form
U can be further reduced with backwards elimination. Repeat the process in the opposite direction until all numbers above and below the pivots are zero, yielding the matrix R.
R is the reduced row echelon form of A. It may also be a lower triangular matrix.
Failure of Elimination
U must have n non-zero pivots for n unknowns.
As noted above, if a pivot is zero, rows should be swapped using permutation matrices. This is a temporary failure.
If rows cannot be swapped to complete elimination, the system has permanent failure