Differences between revisions 6 and 8 (spanning 2 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 6 as of 2025-06-17 13:27:26 →
Size: 770
Editor: DominicRicottone
Comment: Simplify
← Revision 8 as of 2025-07-24 15:47:25 → ⇥
Size: 787
Editor: DominicRicottone
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
'''''Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data''''' (DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085]]) was written by Andrew Meade and S. Bartholomew Craig in 2012. It was published in ''Psychological Methods'' (vol. 17, no. 3). '''Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data''' (DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085]]) was written by Andrew Meade and S. Bartholomew Craig in 2012. It was published in ''Psychological Methods'' (vol. 17, no. 3).
Line 13: Line 13:
CategoryRicottone CategoryRicottone CategoryReadingNotes

Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data

Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085) was written by Andrew Meade and S. Bartholomew Craig in 2012. It was published in Psychological Methods (vol. 17, no. 3).

Authors discuss extent and possible solutions to non-responsivity ("responding without regard to item content").

  • Bigger problem for web surveys due to lack of control over environment.
  • Bogus responses can identify non-responsive individuals. Must be designed with attention to straight-liners; should not be possible to straight-line and pass the test.
  • Consistency indices work, but carry assumptions about what non-responsive data looks like.

CategoryRicottone CategoryReadingNotes

IdentifyingCarelessResponsesInSurveyData (last edited 2025-07-24 15:47:25 by DominicRicottone)