Differences between revisions 6 and 7
⇤ ← Revision 6 as of 2025-06-17 13:27:26 →
Size: 770
Editor: DominicRicottone
Comment: Simplify
← Revision 7 as of 2025-06-17 13:32:55 → ⇥
Size: 766
Editor: DominicRicottone
Comment: Style
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
'''''Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data''''' (DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085]]) was written by Andrew Meade and S. Bartholomew Craig in 2012. It was published in ''Psychological Methods'' (vol. 17, no. 3). '''Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data''' (DOI: [[https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085]]) was written by Andrew Meade and S. Bartholomew Craig in 2012. It was published in ''Psychological Methods'' (vol. 17, no. 3).

Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data

Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085) was written by Andrew Meade and S. Bartholomew Craig in 2012. It was published in Psychological Methods (vol. 17, no. 3).

Authors discuss extent and possible solutions to non-responsivity ("responding without regard to item content").

  • Bigger problem for web surveys due to lack of control over environment.
  • Bogus responses can identify non-responsive individuals. Must be designed with attention to straight-liners; should not be possible to straight-line and pass the test.
  • Consistency indices work, but carry assumptions about what non-responsive data looks like.

CategoryRicottone

IdentifyingCarelessResponsesInSurveyData (last edited 2025-07-24 15:47:25 by DominicRicottone)